Editorial Standards

Editorial trust hub for Alcreon. Covers editorial standards, corrections policy, and AI use disclosure on one page.

Operator: Alcreon Services Inc. | Calgary, Alberta, Canada | Last updated: May 13, 2026

Jump to: Editorial Standards · Corrections Policy · AI Use Disclosure

Editorial Standards

1. Purpose

Alcreon is an AI intelligence publication operated by Alcreon Services Inc. This Editorial Standards document explains the publication standards used for Alcreon.com articles, newsletters, explainers, guides, research notes, and related editorial work.

Alcreon's job is to publish clear, independent analysis about artificial intelligence, software, technology markets, business operations, and related systems. The publication is useful, skeptical, source-aware, and explicit about uncertainty.

2. Separation from Alcreon Labs

Alcreon.com is the editorial publication. AlcreonLabs.com is the services and commercial site. Alcreon.com may link to Alcreon Labs in a restrained way, but editorial judgment is not distorted to sell services.

Commercial pages, service offers, product demos, audit offers, and implementation sales material belong on AlcreonLabs.com, not in the core editorial surface of Alcreon.com.

3. Sourcing standards

Alcreon prefers primary sources where available. Primary sources may include company filings, official product documentation, research papers, public model cards, technical reports, legal and regulatory documents, standards, datasets, earnings materials, official blog posts, direct interviews, or original analysis.

When secondary sources are used, the article makes that clear and avoids laundering unsupported claims through vague attribution. Claims that are material to the argument are linked, cited, or explained.

4. Accuracy and verification

Before publication, factual claims are checked against reliable sources. Charts, calculations, dates, technical descriptions, quotations, and entity names are reviewed for accuracy.

Alcreon avoids presenting speculation as fact. Forecasts, judgments, interpretations, and estimates are labelled as such. Where the evidence is incomplete, the article says so.

For claims that could be defamatory if untrue (allegations of crime, fraud, dishonesty, financial impropriety, or other serious misconduct), Alcreon relies on primary-source evidence and, where appropriate, gives the subject an opportunity to respond before publication.

5. Opinion and analysis

Alcreon is allowed to have a point of view. Strong analysis is not the same as neutrality. However, opinion is not disguised as fact, and critique is grounded in evidence, logic, or clearly stated judgment.

Where a statement is opinion rather than fact, the article makes the distinction visible (for example, "in our view," "the evidence suggests," "we read this as").

6. Conflicts of interest

Material conflicts are disclosed when they are relevant to a piece. Relevant conflicts may include financial interests, advisory relationships, paid sponsorships, client relationships, investments, employment relationships, or other circumstances that could reasonably affect reader trust.

If an analyst or contributor writes about a company, product, project, or market in which they have a material financial or business interest, the piece includes a clear disclosure. Alcreon maintains an internal conflicts log that is consulted before assignments are made and before pieces are published.

7. Sponsorships and paid placements

Sponsored content, paid placements, affiliate arrangements, or other compensated editorial-adjacent material is clearly labelled. Sponsorship does not buy editorial conclusions.

Alcreon does not sell undisclosed favorable coverage. Sponsors and commercial partners do not receive approval rights over independent editorial work unless the piece is clearly identified as sponsored or partner content.

8. AI-assisted writing and research

AI tools may be used for research support, summarization, drafting assistance, editing, outlining, code review, document organization, and quality control. AI tools are not treated as factual authorities.

Every material factual claim remains the responsibility of the human author or editor. AI-generated citations, quotations, legal statements, statistics, or technical claims are verified before publication. AI is not credited as an author.

See the AI Use Disclosure section below for additional detail.

9. Corrections

Substantive errors are corrected under the Corrections Policy section below. Corrections are clear enough that readers can understand what changed and why. Minor typographical, formatting, grammar, or style edits may be made without a correction note if they do not change the meaning.

10. Use of anonymous or confidential sources

Anonymous or confidential sources are used cautiously. The editor understands the source's identity, basis of knowledge, and reason for confidentiality before relying on the source for a material claim.

Confidential information received from a source is not published if doing so would violate law, a binding obligation, or an agreed confidentiality condition, unless counsel approves the publication plan.

11. Byline and attribution

Bylines identify the human author or accountable editor. Contributors, researchers, editors, and analysts may be credited where appropriate. AI systems are not listed as authors.

12. Updates and archival material

Alcreon may update published material to reflect new evidence, correct errors, improve clarity, or maintain usefulness. Material updates show an updated date or note where the change affects the reader's understanding.

Archived material may remain online even if later developments make it incomplete. Older material is not silently rewritten to hide prior analysis.

13. Reader contact

Editorial questions, corrections, and source material may be sent to editor@alcreon.com or corrections@alcreon.com.

Corrections Policy

1. Purpose

This Corrections Policy explains how Alcreon handles factual errors, material omissions, updates, clarifications, and reader correction requests.

2. What counts as a correction

A correction is appropriate when published material contains a factual error, materially misleading statement, incorrect citation, incorrect date, incorrect quotation, incorrect attribution, broken calculation, mislabeled chart, or other issue that could affect a reader's understanding.

A correction may also be appropriate when a piece omits context that materially changes the meaning of the published analysis.

3. What does not usually require a correction note

The following may be fixed without a formal correction note if the change does not alter meaning:

typographical errors;
broken formatting;
minor grammar or punctuation changes;
dead link replacement where the source and claim are unchanged;
layout, image, metadata, or accessibility fixes;
headline or deck edits that do not change the substantive claim; and
style edits that improve clarity without changing the argument.

4. How to submit a correction request

Correction requests may be sent to corrections@alcreon.com. A useful request should include:

the article URL or newsletter title;
the specific text, chart, claim, date, or quotation at issue;
why the item is wrong or misleading;
supporting source material; and
your name and contact information, unless there is a good reason to remain anonymous.

We aim to review and respond to substantive correction requests within a reasonable time.

5. Review process

When a correction request is received, Alcreon reviews the challenged material, checks the available evidence, consults the author or editor where appropriate, and decides whether a correction, clarification, update, editor's note, or no change is warranted.

Where a legal, privacy, confidential-source, or defamation issue is involved, counsel is consulted before publication of the correction or response.

6. Correction notes

For substantive corrections, Alcreon adds a dated note to the article. The note describes the correction in plain language without unnecessary defensiveness.

Example format:

Correction, [date]: An earlier version of this article misstated [issue]. The article has been corrected to say [corrected statement].

7. Clarifications and updates

A clarification may be used when the original statement was not strictly false but could reasonably be misunderstood. An update may be used when new information becomes available after publication.

Example format:

Update, [date]: This article has been updated to include [new development or additional source].

Clarification, [date]: This article has been clarified to explain [issue].

If an error appears in a newsletter, Alcreon may correct the web version, add a correction note, and, if the error is material, send a correction or clarification to subscribers.

If an error is made in a social post, video description, podcast note, or off-site syndication, Alcreon corrects the off-site material where possible and links back to the corrected canonical article where appropriate.

10. Retractions and removals

A retraction or removal may be appropriate for serious factual failures, legal risk, privacy issues, fabricated material, compromised sourcing, security concerns, or content that no longer meets publication standards. Retractions are documented where doing so does not create additional legal, privacy, or security risk.

11. Transparency standard

Alcreon corrects meaningful mistakes plainly. The goal is not to erase the existence of an error. The goal is to give readers the most accurate version of the record and enough context to understand what changed.

12. Contact

Correction requests: corrections@alcreon.com.

AI Use Disclosure

1. Overview

This AI Use Disclosure explains how Alcreon may use artificial intelligence tools in its editorial and operational workflow.

2. How AI tools may be used

Alcreon may use AI tools for:

research support and source organization;
summarizing long documents for internal review;
drafting assistance;
editing, copy refinement, and style review;
headline, outline, or structure exploration;
code, chart, and calculation checks;
transcription or note organization;
internal productivity; and
identifying questions that need human verification.

3. Human responsibility

AI systems do not replace human editorial responsibility. A human author or editor is responsible for the published work. AI tools are not credited as authors because they do not take responsibility, verify facts, own conflicts, or answer for editorial judgment.

4. Fact-checking and source verification

AI-generated factual claims, citations, quotations, statistics, legal descriptions, technical explanations, and calculations are checked before publication. AI tools can fabricate sources, misquote materials, overstate certainty, and miss context.

Alcreon's standard is that material factual claims should be supported by reliable sources, preferably primary sources where available.

5. No fabricated sources

Alcreon does not publish AI-generated citations or references unless they have been independently verified. If a source cannot be located or checked, it is not cited as factual support.

6. Reader and subscriber data

We do not knowingly use reader emails, subscriber records, source materials, or content submitted to Alcreon to train third-party AI models. Where we use AI tools internally, we select vendors and settings that disable input training where available. We cannot guarantee the internal operations of third-party AI providers beyond their published terms and the controls they make available.

If AI tools are used to process operational information, Alcreon assesses the tool's confidentiality, security, data retention, and training settings before use.

7. Confidential source material

Confidential source material, embargoed materials, sensitive personal information, private financial information, non-public client information, and legally privileged information are not entered into AI tools unless the tool, contract, configuration, and specific facts support that use.

8. AI-generated images, charts, and media

Where AI-generated or materially AI-modified images, charts, audio, or video are published, Alcreon includes a visible label in a caption, byline, or annotation adjacent to the asset, identifying the AI involvement in plain language.

AI-generated visual material is not used to misrepresent real events, people, evidence, or data.

9. Analysis, not automation theater

Alcreon's use of AI tools is meant to improve research and editing leverage, not to replace judgment. The publication does not hide behind generic AI content. Alcreon's value is judgment, source selection, explanation, and accountability.

10. Changes to this Disclosure

AI tools and norms change quickly. Alcreon may update this Disclosure as its workflow, tools, legal obligations, or editorial standards change.

11. Contact

Questions about AI use may be sent to editor@alcreon.com.